| Straight women are not members of the LGBT community! Film at 11! |
[Sep. 30th, 2009|04:16 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | fandom, gay, wtf | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | mellow | ] |
Why hello there, Lambdawank! I believe you shall be extremely useful during my Yaoicon panel. After I'm done headdesking, anyway.
Basic rundown: Lambda Literary Awards clarifies rules to make it clear that it's an award for books about and by LGBT people. Cue lots of straight slash writers flailing all over the place.
Linkspam picked it up here.
I'm thinking of going through and picking out choice bits for my panel "What's a Nice Lesbian Like You Doing in a Fandom Like This". Any suggestions from the peanut gallery? |
|
|
| There are probably going to be who disagree with me |
[Jul. 20th, 2009|12:58 am] |
I was reading the comments to this lovely blog on Pam's House Blend about a gay couple that went to a friend's wedding, officiated at it, and opened hearts and minds just by being out and loving.
It startled me that there were a number of comments that responded that they would never go to a heterosexual couple's wedding and/or stop respecting said couple because that couple is entering into a discriminatory institution by getting married.
I just don't understand how someone who would never DREAM of sitting at a segregated lunch counter, crossing a picket line, or any of dozens of other violations of solidarity with the disenfranchised, would participate in a discriminatory institution by choosing to get married at this time. Yesterday a wonderful woman who devotes her life to peace and justice told me she was getting married and wanted my address to invite me to the wedding. I was mute I was so hurt and shocked. She was oblivious to what she was doing.
I never thought of it that way-- marriage isn't like a lunch counter, and you can't put pressure on the owner by boycotting. Refraining from doing something harmful-- like crossing a picket line-- or boycotting a private institution, like a lunch counter is entirely different from refraining from making a public commitment to each other. Civil Marriage is a number of privileges that are conferred upon the couple that are useful and, indeed, in some situations necessary. It's a recognition of commitment, and refraining from making that commitment to each other (and gaining the ability to make medical decisions for each other, among other rights) doesn't get me any closer to being able to make a commitment to (and medical decisions for) my girlfriend.
I don't think in this particular situation that choosing not to get married in solidarity is something nearly as useful as getting married and then continuing to advocate for others to have the same rights. And while I don't doubt that a group like The National Marriage Boycott might send a strong political message, it bothers me on multiple levels. For one thing, a heterosexual couple is still exercising their choice-- they still have the privilege of being able to choose whether or not to marry, and if they don't understand that, the exercise is useless. And for another, I don't want someone to deprive themselves because I do without. I see it as the same sort of situation as someone choosing not to buy themselves necessities because someone else is going without. It's a nice gesture, if and only if combined with giving to or advocating for the other person, but I don't expect a lot of people to do it, and in the end it seems like a mostly self-centered response anyway. It also centers a certain primacy around marriage rights-- which, yes, marriage rights are extremely important in settling family rights laws and setting the precedent that LGBT people are part of ordinary families, but there are lots of gay rights and advocacy that have nothing whatsoever to do with family/marriage rights.
In the end, if a heterosexual couple chooses to refrain from getting married in solidarity with the LGBT community, that's a nice gesture. I appreciate it. But I don't respect someone who doesn't get married because I can't more than I respect someone who gets married because they're in love, want to make that commitment in front of their God, their country and everyone. Not choosing what's best for you as a couple seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
If this sounds like a visceral, gut reaction, that's because it is. My friend, jhyanmar, is getting married in a few weeks, and I have every respect for the guy. If, God forbid, he should fall into a coma, I want letiwolf to be able to make those medical decisions for him. If they want to foster a child, I want them to be able to do it together. I don't want them to have to jump through hoops and get dicked around just because I'd get dicked around in those situations. |
|
|
| Two videos on gay marriage |
[Apr. 8th, 2009|02:04 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, politics | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | gay | ] |
The first one is Iowa State Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal explaining why he won't support a bill to take away the rights of Iowan gay people to marry. It's two minutes of beautiful smackdown.
BUT! Just so we don't get too cocky, the National Organization for Marriage has put together a rainbow coalition to stop us icky icky gays from getting our gay all over everything.
Via Shakesville |
|
|
| Passing thought |
[Mar. 16th, 2009|09:46 pm] |
The thing that really gets me, when I'm enough of an idiot to watch ex-gay Youtube videos, is how the narratives of how they became not-gay rarely, if ever, mention their former relationships. I always wonder what it's like on the other side of that-- who were you dating? What was the relationship like? What did you see in them and they see in you? How did that last conversation with them go? How did they act or feel when you told them? What did they say? What did you feel when you told them?
It's an odd thing to notice, out of all the things I could see in those videos. But it feels like there's a story that's been erased and I keep wanting to mark up that blank space with a big red pen that says "HERE THERE BE MONSTERS" or something, if you'll forgive the stretched metaphor. |
|
|
| More about that anti-gay library thing |
[Mar. 12th, 2009|10:39 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, library | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | thoughtful | ] |
An update: The librarian was asking for anti-gay books because there had been a formal reconsideration of materials challenge for over 40 books with homosexual themes. Apparently a mother had found the library's booklist and got mad.
In her response to the library list, the requesting librarian (not the one interviewed in the clip below) said:
My goal was to be as prepared as possible in meeting with this family and being able to offer the best information I possibly could. If their desire is to see books added to the collection on this topic, I wanted to be aware of possible titles, their availability and their appropriateness. This challenge has taught me so many things about being a librarian and being a public servant. I want to serve my community to the best of my ability, despite my personal beliefs. My community includes both conservative parents and gay teens. I can not judge either set of patrons. And my voice needs to represent our library. Staying quiet, respectful, and diplomatic is very hard in light of personal attacks and misinformation. I need to remain very objective in my quest to protect and fight for American Freedoms.
Video clip from one of the local news channels is here.
The mother who challenged the books has a blog here. |
|
|
| I can't be at the rallies |
[Nov. 15th, 2008|09:28 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | determined | ] |
Since I'm working today and there isn't a rally I can get to on my lunchbreak, I'm being supportive in another way.
A good friend of mine just opened up the website Gay Neighbors. It's a site to tell stories and connect with one another. It's a chance for people of all stripes to hear the stories of their neighbors and maybe learn a little bit about them.
From their About Us page:
The mantra that we have heard over the years, even as acceptance grew, was the sentiment that gay people are tolerable so long as we don't "shove it in their faces." With this hanging over our heads, it's been easy for our voice to grow quieter. The "two" communities could leave each other alone and be happy enough. It was easy to grow silent and complacent and keep pride confined to our own neighborhoods, even our own households.
The problem with this way of living is that it then kept us from opening up to the members of the community that might not know us so well. While the opponents of our marriages went door to door, speaking face to face with uncertain voters, we continued to stay quiet. Our efforts to reach out to strangers needed to not only equal but surpass those of our opponents. It is just these strangers who may have supported us if they had been given a true window in to our lives.
Instead, to many, we are enigmatic. It may be difficult for some people to imagine what our lives are like without knowing us, instead only drawing example from popular media and public opinion. It's much easier to write off the rights of people when you don't know them and easier still when you have no idea what their lives are like. When you don't know their faces or their children and have no examples to call to mind of the love that their partnerships are based upon.
...
The hope for this web site is that it will be a tool to help begin that conversation. We hope that this site will be the photo album of our community, including not only snapshots of the lives of gay families across the nation but also of our straight supporters. Just as important as our own voices are the voices of our supporting brothers and sisters. They have held us up through these changing times. They have spoken for us in places we have been unable to speak and have stood as proof to those who mistakenly believe that our happiness is a threat to their happiness. Their voice -- your voice -- will continue to be a great asset and blessing to our community and we thank you now for everything you have offered us and the kindness you continue to show us.
I'm working on my story now, and I hope you all are reading this will write your own, and pass this link on to others. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Oct. 22nd, 2008|12:31 pm] |
There's a lively discussion going on over at one of my Jewish Women's Group mailing lists, about the rights conferred by legal marriage that aren't conferred by "civil unions" or other institutions. This was set off by one list member discussing with a coworker that fact that said coworker's "friends are struggling with the idea that marriage is in the Bible between a man and a woman and that the idea of marriage is one of the few places where religion and the state overlap."
To which another list member responded: It's interesting that your colleague brought up the definition of marriage in the Bible. Perhaps she's unaware that according to the Tanakh (Old Testament), the act of a man marrying a woman is defined in any one of three ways:
- Shtar - contract - Bi'a - vaginal heterosexual intercourse - Kessef - the exchange of a valuable item (I think this refers to some sort of payment to the woman's father for the "loss" of a daughter in the home)
[Actually, this might not even appear in the Bible at all, but in the Oral Law somewhere (hehe, I said "oral"), probably in the Mishna and/or Talmud.]
So according to the Bible, a hetero man who hooks up with a hetero woman for a one night stand has effectively married that woman. However the laws pertaining to marriage in the Bible relate only to Jews, so the point is really moot for Christians. However, your colleague might be interested to know that in the old days, some people did get married by simply having sex. Yet I don't see any Fundamentalist Christians running around demanding that people who hook up at discotheques file for divorce the next morning.
For me, the biblical argument about the "sacred" nature of marriage is a flimsy one, given the above info. Even the marriage contract which is still used today in Orthodox Jewish hetero weddings basically stipulates that the groom needs to provide for the bride (with a home, income, and sexual satisfaction--note, he must satisfy *her*). It's basically an ancient legal document that was intended to protect the rights of women within marriage (because otherwise they'd have been completely powerless).
If you can get married by fucking someone, and if marriage is a legal contract that protects the rights of women in a partnership, why can't the definition of marriage be extended to protect the rights of all people involved in a partnership? And what is so sacred about fucking as a symbol of partnership that needs to be protected?
Furthermore, these Christians who look to the Bible to define marriage need to rethink their definition of marriage. Again, the description in the Old Testament applies to Jews, whereas the Catholic definition of marriage as a sacrament does not necessarily apply to Fundamentalist Christians who reject the authority of the Catholic Church. Which begs the question, by what religious authority do Fundamentalist Christians define *their* idea of marriage? I've only read small sections of the New Testament, so I honestly have no idea. But I think it sort of removes fuel from that particular fire.
Take this post with a grain of salt-- since this was posted on an informal mailing list, it may not be entirely accurate-- but I think it's interesting to discuss the biblical definition of marriage in this situation, since that's what it seems a lot of people are basing their beliefs on the awful unholiness of gay marriage on. |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Oct. 10th, 2008|09:35 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, politics | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | pleased | ] |
Congrats to all the gay couples in Connecticut! They can now marry.
Article here. |
|
|
| I am deeply disappointed in you |
[Jul. 14th, 2008|01:13 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | anime, gay | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | ill | ] |
Wait, there's seriously NO Petshop of Horrors fanfiction with Woo-fei?
Dude, extremely hot, Chinese Mafia boss who drags D around, wiretaps the shop, shows up suspiciously on a regular basis and who refuses to take a pet from D's shop. Where is my porn? Fandom disappoints me.
Also, his name is Wufei. It amuses me in an oblique way that I can now imagine extraordinarily stupid, bad crossovers.
Why yes, I did just discover the Petshop of Horrors sequel series. LOL LATE.
And here I thought there wasn't anything anime-ish that could interest me right now. Huh.
... I'm trying to pretend this head cold doesn't exist. But I can't lay down without stuffing up again and being unable to breath. Stupid body. |
|
|
| Why are people idiots? |
[Aug. 1st, 2007|10:18 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | antiyaoi, gay | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | indescribable | ] |
| [ | Play it for me |
| | I'm Like a Lawyer With The Way I'm Always Trying To Get You Off (Me & You) - FOB | ] |
And in other "I hate humanity news"...
Normally antiyaoi is pretty light-hearted. They take their resident trolls pretty well (that would be me and a few other yaoi fans)-- mostly because a good half the membership (including at least one of the mods) doesn't mind some yaoi, they just hate the cliches and the fangirls. Which I totally relate to.
There are rules in place about keeping the line between anti-yaoi and anti-gay clear, and there's the occasional minor blow up over it. Minor because most members figure out how to talk around the issue. But then the occasional new person shows up. And doesn't know when to shut up.
(I find the first thread in the first post mildly amusing, since netbug is actually pretty Christian. S/he just learned very quickly to be circumspect about the morality aspect... And was trying to impart this bit of wisdom to the OP. It didn't work too well.)
In case you want to get straight to the vitriol, Try this thread, where she tells me that being yelled at online is the same as being beaten for coming out of the closet, and then tells me that my girlfriend should leave me for a man because all she needs is the cock.
Or this thread in her apology post about how she meant everything she said, she just wants to move on, but she doesn't care about forgiveness and I'm just a quitter because I can't find a good man. Bonus for one of the mods giving her a warning and shadsie telling her off.
A lot of the fun threads are gone in the first post because she went around deleting stuff, woe. But there's plenty of vitriol and eye-gouging entertainment for all!
As a note, I'd like to point out how warm and fuzzy it makes me feel that a bunch of the antiyaoi regulars were bitching her out too.
ETA: Twit got us on Fandom_Wank (color me unsurprised :D) So she's been banninated from antiyaoi. In retaliation (to spoil our fun) she deleted all the comments on both posts. But there are screencaps at the F_W post here, if you want, and if anyone REALLY needs, I'm sure I can go back through my e-mails to rebuild the more boggling of our conversations.
ETA the Second: You know, the most annoying thing about this? I'm bisexual with a general preference for women. I like men. I just happen to be totally in love with a woman, and have a certain marked preference for tits. But I couldn't SAY THAT because she'd be able to say "AHA! You like men. Clearly you can choose to date men." And totally ignore the fact that I don't want to date anyone besides comixologist. I fell in love with who I fell in love with. That's what happens when you don't care about the gender of your partner.
And, sadly, I've had a lesbian aunt tell me this exact thing-- "It will make your life easier. If you can date men, date men." |
|
|
| Final Project |
[Nov. 27th, 2006|03:21 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, school | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | anxious | ] |
I need to get to work on my final project for Gay and Lesbian Art and Culture, so I'm asking for a bit of help. My topic is "gays and lesbians in mainstream comic books", and I'm in need of scans.
So if you have scans of any of these characters, preferably referring to their sexuality, I would be grateful. (It would also be helpful if I could get a date for the issue, or at least a time period.)
I won't mind scans of gay, lesbian or genderqueer characters who aren't on the list, as long as it's relatively mainstream. If you have earlier characters who are GLBT I'd be most interested, since AFAIK Northstar is the earliest and most well-known mainstream character.
Marvel Northstar (Earlier scans of Alpha Flight, hinting at his orientation would be appreciated, as well as his actual coming out.) Anole Colossus (Ultimate X-Men only) Hulkling Wiccan Karolina Xavin Rainmaker (Gen-13) Xian Coy Manh
DC Batwoman Renee Montoya Obsidian Pied Piper
Other Purgatori Dr. Alison Mann Apollo and Midnighter John Constantine
x-posted to scans_daily |
|
|
| (no subject) |
[Nov. 2nd, 2006|04:34 am] |
I'm missing a bunch of really cool looking panels at BASCon this year (since I'll be back in SF, taking the last of my CSETs and will be gone from, like noon until 5 or 6pm. Lucky me.) Like the "Race in Fandom", and "Crossovers" panel. Sad panda.
But, you know what? I have to remember that next year I should offer to run a panel titled "The Cult of Mean". XD Fandom_Wank ahoy, mateys. Yeah, I know a bunch of people on my flist don't really like the place. I vaguely remember learning about it because someone grudgewanked harukami, even. But it would be nice to sit around and mock slash. I mean, It wouldn't even have to be about F_W proper. It could be about talking about the things we hate in fandoms, the things we want to change, and the lovely mockable bits about our favorite TV shows, like Tom Welling's slowly chubbifying belly and Jensen Ackle's duck-lips. And, you know, the silly moments and bad acting.
I could offer to run it at Yaoicon too. I was wondering what sort of panel I could offer to run at YCon, since I haven't watched anime in for-fucking-ever.
vampireanneke, think it'd run?
This is just a note to myself, even though I'll still forget it by next year. Too bad panel sign-ups are WAY OVER this year.
ETA: My girl thinks the panel should be titled "The Cult of Mean: Why Your Fandom Sucks". Heh. I love my girl. |
|
|
| America's Next Top Lesbian |
[Sep. 29th, 2006|02:29 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | antm, gay | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | curious | ] |
| [ | Play it for me |
| | Cowboy Mouth - Everybody Loves Jill | ] |
So, the other night, scootermcgaffin IMs me to ask: "Is it bad that I'm shipping Megan/Michelle?"
I told him it most certainly wasn't (and even less so after watching them interact on the show). They're both hot.
And you know what? They're both lesbians. And out. Megan told AfterEllen that she and Michelle were both out, and that a number of the girls on the show were bi-curious. Also, Megan is also not a bartender-- she does film production, which is kind of neat.
I have no hopes that Megan or Michelle are reading this, but if you are: Girl, call me!
Joking, joking. comixologist, don't hurt me! |
|
|
| I'm a bad, bad girl |
[Aug. 24th, 2006|04:29 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, pointlessness, religion | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | predatory | ] |
| [ | Play it for me |
| | The Fools of Prophecy (Shotei Ha'nevua) - Ach Shel Salim | ] |
Take money from Focus on the Family-- get a new Narnia DVD!
Found this at daily_granola and apparently crossposted, like, everyfuckingwhere.
( How to get some free schwag! )
Yeah, it's probably kinda declasse, but I figure they're trying to take my civil rights, they might as well send me a Narnia DVD in exchange. |
|
|
| Gay comic characters! |
[Aug. 20th, 2006|11:35 am] |
| [ | Tags | | | gay, school | ] |
| [ | If I wasn't apathetic, I'd be |
| | hungry | ] |
Here's my list, please add ones I've forgotten/don't know about, since my knowledge of comic history is shaky. Genderqueer and gay characters both work.
This is preliminary research for a large paper I'll be writing at the end of the semester.
Marvel Northstar Anole Colossus (Ultimate X-Men only) Hulkling Wiccan Karolina Xavin (genderqueer)
DC Batwoman Uhm... policechick whose name escapes me, who had an affair with Batwoman
Indie comics are cool too, I just don't KNOW most of them, so anyone who can steer me well is good. |
|
|